In Nma/985/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 Thane v. Ketankumar J. Patel, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within a period of 4 weeks from today, the appeal shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 985 OF 2018
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (ST) NO. 3265 OF 2018
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3.. Applicant In the matter betweenThe Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3.. Appellant v/s. Ketankumar J. Patel .. Respondent
Mr. Sham Walve for the applicant / appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 25[th] JANUARY, 2019
1.This motion has been taken up to condone the delay of 55 days in
filing the present appeal.
2.For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of motion, the
delay of 55 days caused in filing the Income Tax Appeals is condoned.
3.The motion are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a).
4.Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within a
period of 4 weeks from today, the appeal shall stands dismissed without
further reference to the Court.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue