Nma/99/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. J. V. Gokal And Co
High Court
21 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/99/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. J. V. Gokal And Co
Date of order
21 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/99/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. J. V. Gokal And Co, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
164 nma 99-19 in itxa 1324-15-o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.99 OF 2019IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1324 OF 2015
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-17… Applicant/Appellant V/s.M/s J.V. Gokal & Co.… Respondent
---
Mr.P.C.Chhotaray for the Applicant/Appellant.Ms.Rutuja Pawar i/by Mr. S.C.Tiwari for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 21, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This notice of motion is taken out by the appellant-revenueseeking condonation of delay of 92 days in seeking restoration ofthe Income Tax Appeal which was dismissed as not pressed forlow tax effect. It is pointed out by the counsel for the revenue thatthe Income Tax Appeal No.1324 of 2015 was erroneouslywithdrawn on the ground of low tax effect. He pointed out thateven as per the revised monetary relief set out in CBDT CircularNo.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018, the tax effect is higher.Counsel for the assessee does not dispute this factual position. In
Priya Soparkar
264 nma 99-19 in itxa 1324-15-o
that view of the matter, the order dated 25[th] June, 2018 passed
in Income Tax Appeal is recalled. Appeal is restored to file. It shall
be placed for the admission herein. Notice of motion is disposed
of. No costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.