Nms/1374/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii v. Piem Hotels Ltd
High Court
18 Sep 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nms/1374/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii v. Piem Hotels Ltd
Date of order
18 Sep 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nms/1374/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii v. Piem Hotels Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Notice of Motion No.1374 of 2002
In
Income Tax Application (L) No.43 of 2002
The Commissioner of Income
Tax. .. .. Applicant
v/s.
Piem Hotels Ltd. .. .. Respondent
Mr.A.N.Kotangale for Applicant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for
respondent.
-----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 18th September 2006
P.C. :
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this
Motion. Mr.Tripathi appears for the respondent.
2. Motion seeks condonation of delay of 69
days in filing the Application. Explanation has
been given in the supporting Affidavit, namely,
that the Department was undergoing the herculean
task of restructuring. We accept the explanation.
Delay condoned. Motion is granted in terms of
prayer (a). Application be numbered.
3. Motion disposed of.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
-2-
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue