Nms/1450/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Bombay v. Borosil Glass Works Ltd
High Court
03 Oct 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nms/1450/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Bombay v. Borosil Glass Works Ltd
Date of order
03 Oct 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nms/1450/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Bombay v. Borosil Glass Works Ltd, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1450 OF 2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1450 OF 2002
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.49 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.49 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.49 OF 2002
WITH
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1452 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1452 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1452 OF 2002
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.50 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.50 OF 2002
WITH
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1453 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1453 OF 2002
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.51 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.51 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Applicant.
V/s.
M/s.Borosil Glass Works Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D.Kango i/b. H.D.Rathod for applicant in all the
Motions.
None for respondent.
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 3RD OCTOBER, 2006.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 3RD OCTOBER, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard Mr.Kango in support these Motions.
The Motions seek condonation of delay in each of the
- = : 2 : = -
three matters. The delay in each of these matters is
for a period of 114 days. The explanation given in the
supporting affidavits point out administrative
difficulties which caused delay. The Motion has been
served on the respondent in each of the matter. The
affidavit of service has been filed. None is present
for the respondent.
In the circumstances, the Motions are
allowed. Delay condoned. Applications be numbered and
listed for admissions on 15th October, 2006.
Respondent in all the matters to be served
once again.
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue