In Nms/1606/1997 Of M/S. Goenka Trading Co v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the disposal of the substantive reference, the motion does not survive and hence the same is disposed of as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1606 OF 1997ANDINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.46 OF 1997
M/s. Goenka Trading Co.
..Applicant.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Respondent.
Mrs. Vasanti B. Patel for applicant.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. Minutes of the order in Income Tax Reference No.46 of 1997 signed by the advocates appearing for the parties is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Reference stands disposed of in terms of the Minutes of order with no order as to costs.
2. In view of the disposal of the substantive reference, the motion does not survive and hence the same is disposed of as such. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue