Case Law › High Court › Nms/285/1996 Of The Director Of Income T...

Nms/285/1996 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S. Islam Gymkhana

High Court 20 Dec 2005 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Dec 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nms/285/1996 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S. Islam Gymkhana, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.285 OF 1996 IN WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.45 OF 1996 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.285 OF 1996 IN WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.45 OF 1996 Director of Income-tax (Exemption) ..Applicant. V/s. M/s.Islam Gymkhana ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for applicant. Ms.Kusum Kanojia i/b. M/s.Matubhai Jumeitaram for respondent. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2005. P.C. :- Heard Mr. Kotangale in support of this Motion. Ms.Kanojia appears for the respondent. The motion seeks condonation of delay of more than 472 days in filing the application. The explanation given in support thereof is not at all satisfactory is not at all satisfactory. The application is sought to be made concerning assessment year 1983-84. No reason to entertain the motion. Motion rejected. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, application also stands dismissed. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.