Nms/3311/1995 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. M/S. Islam Gym Khana
High Court
20 Dec 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nms/3311/1995 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. M/S. Islam Gym Khana
Date of order
20 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nms/3311/1995 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. M/S. Islam Gym Khana, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3311 OF 1995 IN WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.45 OF 1996
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3311 OF 1995
IN
WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.45 OF 1996
Director of Income-tax (Exemption) ..Applicant.
V/s.
M/s.Islam Gymkhana ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for applicant.
Ms.Kusum Kanojia i/b. M/s.Matubhai Jumeitaram for
respondent.
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
Heard Mr. Kotangale in support of this
Motion. Ms.Kanojia appears for the respondent. The
motion seeks condonation of delay of more than 461 days
in filing the application. The explanation given in
support thereof is not at all satisfactory is not at
all satisfactory. The application is sought to be made
concerning assessment year 1983-84. No reason to
entertain the motion. Motion rejected.
In view of dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, application also stands dismissed.
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue