In Nms/875/1998 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Baroda Rayon Corpn. Ltd Bombay, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 875 OF 1998WITHINCOME TAX APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 1996
The Commissioner of Income-tax.V/s.
M/s.Baroda Rabon Corpn.Ltd.
... Appellant.... Respondent.
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28th April 2009.
P.C. :----
.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
cannot be condoned. Notice of motion is, thus,
rejected with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.