Case Law › High Court › Nmw/449/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nmw/449/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research And Development Centre

High Court 25 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Oct 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nmw/449/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research And Development Centre, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2320 OF 2002 M/s.M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research &Development Centre ....Petitioner .Versus. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-III, Mumbai & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Firoze B. Andhyarujina, Senior Counsel with Mr.Ajay Khatlawala and Ms.Rajani Divkar I/b Little & Co. for the Petitioner. Dr.P. Daniel with Ms.Padma Divakar for the Respondents. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.312 OF 2009INWRIT PETITION NO.3284 OF 2004 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.449 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3284 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-III, Mumbai ....Applicant / ….Ori.Respondent .Versus. M/s.M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research & Development Centre AND ....Respondent ….Ori.Petitioner WRIT PETITION NO.3284 OF 2004 M/s.M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research & Development Centre ....Petitioner .Versus. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-III, Mumbai ....Respondent Mr.Firoze B. Andhyarujina, Senior Counsel with Mr.Ajay Khatlawala and Ms.Rajani Divkar I/b Little & Co. for the Petitioner. Dr.P. Daniel with Ms.Padma Divakar for the Applicant in Notice of Motion No.312 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.3284 of 2004 and for the Original Respondent. Ms.P.S. Cardozo for the Applicant in Notice of Motion No.449 of 2010 in Writ Petition No.3284 of 2004. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.DATE : 25TH OCTOBER, 2012. P.C. :- 1.Both the parties state that in view of the Income Tax Reference itself having been disposed of finally, these proceedings do not survive and are accordingly disposed of. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.