Case LawHigh Court › N.n. Swaminathan Chettiar v. Assistant C...

N.n. Swaminathan Chettiar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Cirlce Iii, Madurai

High Court 28 Nov 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
N.n. Swaminathan Chettiar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Cirlce Iii, Madurai
Date of order
28 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In N.n. Swaminathan Chettiar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Cirlce Iii, Madurai, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Recording the endorsement, these tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. nv (A.S.M.J.) (G.A.M.J.) 28.11.2024 Internet: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/No ToThe Asst.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

T.C.A. Nos. 637 to 642 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.11.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABE MR .JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.(A) Nos. 637 to 642 of 2010 S. Palaniappan ..Appellant in T.C.A. Nos.637 & 638 of 2010 N.N. Swaminathan Chettiar Vs. ..Appellant inT.C.A.Nos.639to 642 of 2010 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Cirlce III, Madurai. ..Respondent inall the appeals Appeals under Section 260A of Prayer in T.C.A. Nos. 637 to 642 of 2010: Income Tax Act, 1961 as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 31.10.2008 passed in I.T.A. Nos. 913/Mds/2007, 914/Mds/2007, 956/Mds/2007, 957/Mds/2007, 958/Mds/2007 & 959/Mds/2007 respectively. For Appellantin all the appeals::Mr.T. VasudevanFor Respondentin all the appeals::Mr.J. Narayanasamy,Senior Standing Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A. Nos. 637 to 642 of 2010 DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. AND G. ARUL MURUGAN,J. nv J U D G M E N T (Delivered by DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.) Mr.T. Vasudevan, learned counsel for the appellants makes an endorsement to the effect that the assessees do not wish to pursue the tax case appeals as they have availed 'Samadhan Scheme'. 2.Recording the endorsement, these tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. nv (A.S.M.J.) (G.A.M.J.) 28.11.2024 Internet: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/No ToThe Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle III, Madurai. T.C.(A) Nos. 637 to 642 of 2010 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan