Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Income Tax Case

Income Tax Case

High Court 19 Dec 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
β€” v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Dismissed

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and in view of the endorsement made, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.12.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.528 and 846 of 2010and M.P.No.1 of 2010 M/s.Asianet Communications Limited,No.5, Haridwar Apartment,3, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai – 600 034. .. Appellant inT.C.A.No.528/2010 M/s.Asianet Communications Limited, No.1-C, Apex Plaza,3, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai – 600 034. .. Appellant inT.C.A.No.846/2010 Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Media Circle I,Chennai – 600 034. .. Respondent inT.C.A.No.528/2010 The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range I,Chennai – 600 034. .. Respondent inT.C.A.No.846/2010 Prayer in T.C.A.No.528/2010: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 11[th] December 2009 passed by the β€œA” Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at Chennai, in 1657/Mds/2002 for the assessment year 1995-96. Prayer in T.C.A.No.846/2010: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 26[th] May 2010 passed under Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (ITA) in Miscellaneous Petiiton No.52/Mds/2010 arising out of Income Tax Appeal No.ITA 1657/Mds/2002 on the records of ITAT. For Appellant:M.V.Swaroop For Respondent:Mr.M.Swaminathan,(In both Appeals)Senior Standing Counsel for IT COMMON JUDGMENT [ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY M.JAICHANDREN, J.] Today, when these Tax Case Appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants had sought the permission of this Court to withdraw both these appeals. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and in view of the endorsement made, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.J., J.] [T.M., J.] VSM 19.12.2016Note: Issue order copy Today (I.e. 19.12.2016) To 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Media Circle I, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range I, Chennai – 600 034. M.JAICHANDREN, J. AND T.MATHIVANAN, J. vsm T.C.A. Nos.528 and 846 of 2010 19.12.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan