Income Tax Case
High Court
04 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
— v. Gapartments, ©2[+]Cross, 33[Ri]Main, I Phase.j.p.nagar, Bengaluru -560 072
Date of order
04 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In v. Gapartments, ©2[+]Cross, 33[Ri]Main, I Phase.j.p.nagar, Bengaluru -560 072, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,RAVI MALIMATH J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT In view of the memo dated 1.2.2019, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 4 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD|INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2623 OF 2005
BEI|WEEN
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXC.R. BUILDING
QUEENS ROADBENGALURU.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 15(1)
C.R. BUILDING QUEENS ROADBENGALURU.
... APPELLANTS |
(BY SRI: K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE).
AND
SMT. T. C. MUTHAMMA|
NO.151,G-1, V. GAPARTMENTS, ©2[*+]CROSS, 33 MAIN, I PHASE.J.P.NAGAR, |BENGALURU -560 072.
~.., RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2600-A OFINCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED|01.02.2005 PASSED IN ITA NO. 213/BANG/2004, FOR THE|ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001-2002, PRAYING (I) TQ)FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW.STATED ABOVE (II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE|THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE|TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO. 213/BANG/2004|DATED: O1.02.2005 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE!APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER|PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME|TAX, CIRCLE - 15, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,RAVI MALIMATH J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
In view of the memo dated 1.2.2019, the appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-JUDGE
SD/-|
JUDGE
nv
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue