Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Case

Income Tax Case

High Court 19 Feb 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
v. Assistant
Date of order
19 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In v. Assistant, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 19.02.2015CWP No .709 of 2014 Smt. Satish Bala Malhotra Petitioner VsS_ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-I, Jalandhar ....Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJTVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH. Present:Mr. Gurminder Singh, Senior Advocate withMr. RPS Bara, Advocatefor the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocatefor the respondents. Rayjive Bhalla, J (Oral For detailed orders, see order of even date passed in CWP No.708 of 2014, titled asM/s Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant 6Commissioner of Income Tax, Central CircleII, Jalandhar (Rajive Bhalla)Judge February 19, 2015VC2Zar (Amol Rattan Singh)Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan