Noblesse Oblige Estate P. Ltd v. Income Tax Offcer
High Court
31 Oct 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Noblesse Oblige Estate P. Ltd v. Income Tax Offcer
Date of order
31 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Noblesse Oblige Estate P. Ltd v. Income Tax Offcer, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner,writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~10
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 9607/2017, CM No.39115/2017 & CM APPL. 39116/2017
NOBLESSE OBLIGE ESTATE P. LTD...... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Ravi Pratap,Mr. Uma Shankar and Mr. SankalpA. Sharma, Advocates.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFCER
..... RespondentThrough:Mr.RahulChaudhary,SeniorStanding Counsel for Revenue.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHO R D E R%31.10.2017
Aftersomehearinglearnedcounselforthepetitionerseekspermission to withdraw the writ petition and states that the petitioner shallraise all contentions and issues before the Assessing Officer including thecontention that the amount of Rs.12,00,20,500/- was given as advance forpurchase of land in the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 to M/s. RootInvestment Pvt. Ltd. which deal never fructified.In the subsequent AY2010-11 shares were issued against the said amounts. He further submitsthat the money for making the said investment was taken partly from theloan amount of Rs.9,53,00,000/- taken by the petitioner from India BullsFinancial Services Ltd.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner,writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. We have not expressed any opinion
on the merits of the matter.The pending applications are disposed of asinfructuous.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
OCTOBER 31, 2017/dk
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.