Case LawHigh Court › No.din Dated 26.12.2023 Passed By The Re...

No.din Dated 26.12.2023 Passed By The Respondent v. Nc: 2024:Khc:33321

High Court 20 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
No.din Dated 26.12.2023 Passed By The Respondent v. Nc: 2024:Khc:33321
Date of order
20 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In No.din Dated 26.12.2023 Passed By The Respondent v. Nc: 2024:Khc:33321, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 5.Under these circumstances, I am of the view that the impugned order being violative of the principles of natural justice, deserves to be set aside and the matter is remitted back to respondent No.5 for consideration afresh in accordance with law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitallysigned byREKHA RLocation:High Courtof Karnataka IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 19779 OF 2024 (TIT) BETWEEN: PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD (PACS) OFFICE AT SOMANAHALLI SOMANAHALLI POST, KADUR CHICKMAGALAUR - 577 138. KARNATAKA, INDIA. THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. MARULASIDDAPPA S R SON OF MR. REVANNASIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDENT OF: SOMANAHALLI SOMANAHALLI, CHIKMAGALUR KARNATAKA - 577 138. [REGISTERED UNDER KARANTAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT, 1959]. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SAMEER GUPTA, ADVOCATE (VIDEO CONFERENCE)) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BENGALURU-3, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560 001. BENGALURU-3, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560 001. 3. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 CHIKMAGALUR, I.T. OFFICE COURT ROAD, CHICKMAGALUR KARNATAKA - 577 101. 4. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM NEW DELHI - 110 003. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER 5. ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT REGIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE BENGALURU - 560 500. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI THIRUMALESH M, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER BEARING No.DIN ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1059045822(1) DATED 26.12.2023 PASSED BY THE R-5 UNDER SECTION 147 READ WITH SECTION 144 AND 144B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner seeks for the following reliefs: i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order bearing ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1059045822 (1) No.DIN dated 26.12.2023 passed by the Respondent No.5 under Section 147 read with Section 144 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Annexure-A); certiorari quashing the order bearing ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1059045822 (1) No.DIN dated 26.12.2023 passed by the Respondent No.5 under Section 147 read with Section 144 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Annexure-A); ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the notice of demand bearing DIN ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1059045884(1) dated 26.12.2023 issued by the Respondent No.5 under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (Annexure- B); certiorari quashing the notice of demand bearing DIN ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1059045884(1) dated 26.12.2023 issued by the Respondent No.5 under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (Annexure- B); iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing order passed under Section 272A(1)(d) bearing DIN ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024- 25/1064263570(1) dated 22.04.2024 issued by the Respondent No.5 (Annexure-C); certiorari quashing order passed under Section 272A(1)(d) bearing DIN ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024- 25/1064263570(1) dated 22.04.2024 issued by the Respondent No.5 (Annexure-C); iv. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing demand notice bearing DINITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1064259190(1) dated 22.04.2024 issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.5; (Annexure-D); certiorari quashing demand notice bearing DINITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1064259190(1) dated 22.04.2024 issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.5; (Annexure-D); iv. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing demand notice bearing DINITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1064259190(1) dated 22.04.2024 issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.5; (Annexure-D); certiorari quashing demand notice bearing DINITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1064259190(1) dated 22.04.2024 issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent No.5; (Annexure-D); v. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing Assessment Order dated 07.06.2024 bearing DIN ITBA/PNL/F/271AAC(1)/2024-25/1065480813(1) issued by the Respondent No.5 under Section 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (Annexure- Ε). certiorari quashing Assessment Order dated 07.06.2024 bearing DIN ITBA/PNL/F/271AAC(1)/2024-25/1065480813(1) issued by the Respondent No.5 under Section 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (Annexure- Ε). vi. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing demand notice bearing DIN ITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1065480701(1) dated 07.06.2024 issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued by the Respondent No.5. (Annexure- F). certiorari quashing demand notice bearing DIN ITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-25/1065480701(1) dated 07.06.2024 issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued by the Respondent No.5. (Annexure- F). vii. Grant costs and interest; and viii. Grant such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require. and circumstances of the case may require. 2.In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, petitioner could not submit his reply to the show cause notice at Annexure-N dated 11.12.2023 and as such, respondent proceeded to pass the exparte assessment order at Annexure-A, without providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, who is before this Court by way of the present petition. It is submitted that if one more opportunity is being provided, the petitioner would submit his reply to the show cause notice and respondent may be directed to proceed further on the merits in accordance with law. 3.Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents would support the impugned order and submits that there is no merit in the appeal and the same is liable to be dismissed. 4.A perusal of the impugned order at Annexure-A, shows that the same is an exparte order pursuant to the petitioner not submitting any reply to the show cause notice dated 11.12.2023. 5.Under these circumstances, I am of the view that the impugned order being violative of the principles of natural justice, deserves to be set aside and the matter is remitted back to respondent No.5 for consideration afresh in accordance with law. 6.Accordingly, I pass the following: ORDER i) The Petition is hereby allowed. ii) Impugned notices/orders at Annexures-A, B, C, D, E and F are quashed. iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent No.5 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of petitioner submitting his reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 11.12.2023. iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit his reply/documents to the aforesaid notice, which shall be considered by respondent No.5, who shall consider the same, provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law. No.5, who shall consider the same, provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan