Case Law › High Court › Nokia India Private Limited v. Assistant...

Nokia India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr

High Court 04 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

04 Feb 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Nokia India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn along with all pending applications.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 20/2025, CM APPLs. 6742/2025, 6743/2025 & 6744/2025 NOKIA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ankul Goyal and Mr. Priyam Bhatnagar, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC Ms. Naincy Jain, JSC Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSC for ITD. with and CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R04.02.2025 % CM APPL.6744/2025 1. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking withdrawal of the appeal. 2. The application is allowed and the same stands disposed of. ITA 20/2025, CM APPLs. 6742/2025 & 6743/2025 3. In view of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn along with all pending applications. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ FEBRUARY 4, 2025 mk TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.