Nokia Networks France Earlier Known As Alcatel Lucent International v. Assisstant Commisisoner Of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 2 2 2 Delhi And Another
High Court
02 Dec 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Nokia Networks France Earlier Known As Alcatel Lucent International v. Assisstant Commisisoner Of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 2 2 2 Delhi And Another
Date of order
02 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nokia Networks France Earlier Known As Alcatel Lucent International v. Assisstant Commisisoner Of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 2 2 2 Delhi And Another, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 7.Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~75
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16601/2024
NOKIA NETWORKS FRANCE EARLIER KNOWN AS ALCATEL LUCENT INTERNATIONAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Mr. Nikhil Agarwal, Mr. Puru Medhira and Mr. Nishank Vashistha, Advocates
versus
ASSISSTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INT TAX 2 2 2 DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Nangia, JSCs with Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R02.12.2024
%
1.Issue notice.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue accepts notice.
3.The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as
under:
“(a) Issue a Writ of mandamus, or a Writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ or Order directing the Respondents to issue the determined refund issued via final Assessment Order dated 28.10.2023 amounting to INR 3,72,94,076 along with applicable statutory interest under section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 within a period of two weeks;
(b) For such further and other reliefs, including costs of this Petition, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case.”
4.It is the petitioner’s case that the amount of refund of ₹3,72,94,076/- is determined as payable to the petitioner in terms of the assessment order dated 28.10.2023. It is also contended that even though there has been no ground for withholding the refund, the respondents have failed and neglected to process the refund.
5.In view of the above, we consider it apposite to direct the respondents to process the petitioner’s claim for refund along with interest, as expeditiously as possible, and preferably within a period of four weeks from date.
6.In the event the respondents are of the view that the refund, as determined, is not payable for any reason, the respondents shall communicate the same to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.
7.Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
DECEMBER 2, 2024
zp
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.