In None v. Vivek Chanana, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 650/2009
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Through:
None.
..... Appellant
versus
VIVEK CHANANA
..... Respondent
Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Ms. Monika Ghai, Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Advs.
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
%
O R D E R28.02.2019
It is submitted by learned counsel for the Revenue that this appeal is below the tax limit prescribed by the notification/ circular dated 11.07.2018. Consequently, it is dismissed for low tax effect.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 28, 2019 ‘pv’
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.