Case LawHigh Court › Noor Mohd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,...

Noor Mohd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab

High Court 17 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Noor Mohd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab
Date of order
17 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Noor Mohd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 281 of 2015 (O&M) Decided on : 17.09.2015 Noor Mohd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab. . . . Appellant . . . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocate for the appellant. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 (in short 'the Act') impugning the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Bench 'A', Chandigarh in ITA No. 221/CHD/2013,dated 10.10.2014 (Annexure A-4). 2.After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellantstates that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty tothe appellant-assessee to approach the appropriate-authority in accordancewith law. 3.Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to theappellant-assessee to take recourse to remedies as may be available to himin accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE September 17, 2015J.Ram (RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan