Noor Mohd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab
High Court
17 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Noor Mohd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab
Date of order
17 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Noor Mohd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 281 of 2015 (O&M) Decided on : 17.09.2015
Noor Mohd.
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab.
. . . Appellant
. . . Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocate for the appellant.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 (in short 'the Act') impugning the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Bench 'A', Chandigarh in ITA No. 221/CHD/2013,dated 10.10.2014 (Annexure A-4).
2.After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellantstates that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty tothe appellant-assessee to approach the appropriate-authority in accordancewith law.
3.Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to theappellant-assessee to take recourse to remedies as may be available to himin accordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
September 17, 2015J.Ram
(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.