Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. The Co...

Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-I

High Court 02 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· mdubench
Parties
Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-I
Date of order
02 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
2021-22
Outcome
Other

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 andW.M.P.(MD).No.18039 of 2022 Noorul Islam Educational Trust,Represented by its Chairman,Dr.A.P.Majeed Khan,10/47A, Haji Manzil,Kollenvilai, Thuckalay,Kanyakumari District – 629 175. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, C.R.Building 2, V.P.Rathinaswamy Nadar Road, V.P.Rathinaswamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai – 625 002. Madurai – 625 002. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Kulamangalam Main Road, Kulamangalam Main Road, Meenambalpuram, Madurai – 625 002. 3. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, Central Processing Centre, Bengaluru – 560 500. Bengaluru – 560 500. ... Respondents _________ Page 1 of 6 W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 2[nd] Respondent from taking any coercive steps for recovery of any amount to any extent in any manner pursuant to the assessment orders passed for the assessment years 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03. For Petitioner:Mr.S.Bharathy KannanFor Respondents:Mr.N.Dilip KumarSenior Standing Counsel O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to forbear the 2[nd] Respondent from taking any coercive steps for recovery of any amount pursuant to the assessment orders passed for the assessment years 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03 respectively. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the assessment for the assessment years 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03 have been made resulting in demand of Rs.67,72,869/- for all the five years put together. He further submitted that an appeal was _________Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 preferred against the said assessment orders before the 1[st] Respondent and the same is pending consideration. As a matter of fact, it is submitted that the matter has been heard and orders were reserved and awaiting pronouncement. In the meanwhile, refund is due to the Petitioner pursuant to the assessment made for the assessment year 2021-22 to the extent of Rs.1,91,81,434/-. He further submitted that there is threat of coercive steps to recover / set off the refund due towards the liability for the assessment years 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03, which is the subject matter of challenge in appeal as set out above. 3. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents that the Revenue has already set out / adjusted the refund for some of the years, although the exact numbers are not available. 4. In such view of the matter, if the Petitioner intends to seek protection against any coercive proceedings, it is always open to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate authority under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by filing stay _________ Page 3 of 6 W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 application pending appeal. The Petitioner may move an application under Section 220(6) of the Act within a week from today. If any such application is filed, the same shall be disposed of within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of such application in accordance with law. The above order will not have any bearing on adjustments, if any, already made. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any view with regard to the merits of the matter and it is open to the appropriate Respondents to consider the same on its own merits. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 02.11.2022 Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order : Yes / No vji Note: Issue order copy by 03.11.2022. _________Page 4 of 6 To 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 02.11.2022 Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order : Yes / No vji Note: Issue order copy by 03.11.2022. _________Page 4 of 6 To 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, C.R.Building 2, V.P.Rathinaswamy Nadar Road, V.P.Rathinaswamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai – 625 002. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Kulamangalam Main Road, Meenambalpuram, Madurai – 625 002. 3. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, Central Processing Centre, Bengaluru – 560 500. 4. The Chairman, Noorul Islam Educational Trust, 10/47A, Haji Manzil, Kollenvilai, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District – 629 175. _________ Page 5 of 6 W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 _________ Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. vji W.P.(MD)No.23941 of 2022 andW.M.P.(MD).No.18039 of 2022 02.11.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan