Norma India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 18(2), New Delhi & Anr
High Court
17 Feb 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Norma India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 18(2), New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
17 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Norma India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 18(2), New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~29
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P. (C) 1405/2017, CM APPL.6429/2017
NORMA INDIA LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 18(2), NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Puneet Rai, Jr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R% 17.02.2017
The petitioner claims a direction for refund of excess amounts pending on account of payments towards income tax liability.
Counsel appearing on advance notice submits that of the amounts claimed `1,09,74,970/- has been granted and that the reconciliation of the balance claimed, i.e., the difference between `1,09,74,970/- and `1,15,94,128/- would be calculated and worked out and payments towards such other amounts, if any, shall also be made.
In view of the submissions, the respondents are directed to W.P. (C) 1405/2017 Page 1 of 2
release the admitted amount of `1,09,74,970/- within a week to the petitioner and also intimate the petitioner about the payment of the balance. In the event of any further grievance, it is open to the petitioner to seek rectification of the order.
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 17, 2017
/vikas/
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
W.P. (C) 1405/2017
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.