In Notice Of Motion v. Larsen & Tubro Ltd.intervener, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION No. 501 OF 2008INWRIT PETITION No.2365 OF 2007
DSL Enterprises P. Ltd. & Anr.PetitionersVs.Director General of Income TaxRespondents& Anr.ANDLarsen & Tubro Ltd.Intervener
Ms. Swati Deshpande with Mr. Mukul Tally i/b.Mohmedbhai & Co. for the Petitioners.None for the Respondent.Mr. Birendra Safar with Sachin Dadacgu & SwayanChopda i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for intervener.
PC :-
1.Matter not on board.Parties have noobjection for hearing the intervention application.
caused disclosed in the motion, Notice of Motion No.501 of 2008 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(2). Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.