In Notice Of Motion v. Bank Of India, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to remove the officeobjections, the appeal stand dismissed for non prosecution without further orders from this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 707 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3131 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantVersusBank of India... RespondentMr.Vimal Gupta and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan forAppellant.CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009P.C.:
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantBank of IndiaMr.Vimal Gupta and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan forAppellant.
. Heard the learned counsel.
. The delay is of 21 days.
. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned.Office to register the appeal subject to appellantsremoving the office objections, if any within sixweeks from today. On failure to remove the officeobjections, the appeal stand dismissed for non
prosecution without further orders from this court.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.