In Notice Of Motion v. M/S.superior Financial Consultancy, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1809 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.834 OF 2006
Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-1Appellant
versus
M/s.Superior Financial Consultancy Respondent
ALONG WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2160 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.834 OF 2006
Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-1Appellant
versus
M/s.Superior Financial Consultancy Respondent
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
Ms.Chaitra Rao i/by M.M.Legal Venture forrespondent.
PC :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant andlearned counsel for the defendants. For thereasons stated in the application in support ofmotion, delay is condoned on the condition thatthe appellant shall pay costs quantified at
Motion is disposed of. Twelve weeks time isgranted to make payement of costs.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant seekspermission to withdraw Notice of Motion No.2160of 2007 as it is for the same relief.Accordingly, Notice of Motion No.2160 of 2007stands disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGEJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.