In Notice Of Motion v. M/S Hercules Hoists Limited,Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2245/2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1028/2010WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2246/2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1024/2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai- AppellantVs.M/s Hercules Hoists Limited,Mumbai Respondent
Ms.Padma Divakar for appellantNone for respondent
CORAM-J.P.DEVADHAR AND
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJDATE-10TH JANUARY,2011.
P.C.
.None for the respondent though served.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion the delay of 70 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue