Nozer E.d. Pandole v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
29 Aug 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nozer E.d. Pandole v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
29 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nozer E.d. Pandole v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 101 OF 1990
Executor of the Estate of .... Applicant
Nozer E.D. Pandole
Vs.
The Commissioner of Income-Tax .... Respondent
Bombay City IV
Ms. Asifa Khan for Applicant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 29TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
. In view of CBDT Circular as the tax
incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs, learned
Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal. Appeal
dismissed as withdrawn. The question of law, if
any, is left open for consideration in an
appropriate case. Refund of Court Fees as per
Rules. Certified copy expedited.
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.