Case LawHigh Court › Odt v. Asst.commisiosner Of Income-Tax

Odt v. Asst.commisiosner Of Income-Tax

High Court 06 May 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Odt v. Asst.commisiosner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
06 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Odt v. Asst.commisiosner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2032 OF 2022 Mahindra CIE Automotive Limited….Petitioner. Vs. Asst.Commisiosner of Income-tax Circle-7(1)(1) & Ors.... Respondents. --------- Mr. Nishant Thakkar a/w Ms Jasmin Amalsadvala i/b Lumiere Law Partners for petitioner. Mr.Pranil Sonawane and Mr. Sunny Udasi and Varsha Gangawane forrespondents. --------- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N.R.BORKAR, JJ. DATE : 6[th] MAY, 2022. P.C.: 1.Mr. Thakkar states that approval granted under Section 151 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity the ‘said Act’) for issuance of impugnednotice dated 30.03.2021 under Section 148 of the said Act is not a validnotice since approval has not been accorded in accordance with provisionsof Section 151 of the said Act. Mr. Thakkar submits that this issue will besquarely covered by an unreported order passed by this Court on 4[th] May2022, in the matter of Johnson and Johnson Private Limited Vs. Deputy Chitra Sonawane 2.Mr. Sonawane in all fairness agrees that the issue in this petition willbe covered by the said Judgment. At the same time Mr. Sonawane alsostates that respondent should be permitted to issue fresh notice inaccordance with law. 3.Therefore, petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) whichreads as under: (a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue aWrit of Certiorari or any other writ order ordirection under Article 226/227 of theConstitution of India calling for the records ofthe case leading to the issue of the impugnedsanction (Exhibit Q), impugned notice datedMarch 30, 2021 (Exhibit N), issuance ofimpugned scrutiny notice dated November 25,2021 (Exhibit S), passing of the impugned orderdated February 14, 2022 (Exhibit V) andsubsequent issue of the 142(1) notice datedFebruary 14, 2021 (Exhibit W) and after goingthrough the same and examining the question oflegality thereof quash, cancel and set aside theimpugned sanction (Exhibit Q), impugnednotice dated March 30, 2021 (Exhibit N),impugned scrutiny notice dated November 25,2021 (Exhibit S), impugned order datedFebruary 14, 2022 (Exhibit V) and subsequent142(1) notice dated February 14, 2021 (ExhibitW). 1Writ Petition (L) No.7733/2022 Chitra Sonawane 3 4.Should respondents issue any fresh notice, petitioner may raise allgrounds including those which have been raised in this petition. 5.Petition disposed. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R.SHRIRAM, J.) Chitra Sonawane
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan