Of Baroon, P.o. Baroon, District- Aurangabad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Patna. 2.Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Gaya
High Court
14 May 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Of Baroon, P.o. Baroon, District- Aurangabad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Patna. 2.Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Gaya
Date of order
14 May 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Of Baroon, P.o. Baroon, District- Aurangabad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Patna. 2.Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Gaya, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.12423 of 2008
DEO NANDAN PRASAD(HUF), a Hindu Undivided through its
Karta Sri Deo Nandan Prasad, son of Late Kesho Prasad Singh, resident
of Baroon, P.O. Baroon, District- Aurangabad.......................Petitioner.
Versus
1.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Patna. 2.Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Gaya...........................Respondents.
-----------
The application is for quashing of entire proceedings including the order taking cognizance dated 27.01.1993 under the provisions of Section 276C and 277 of the Income Tax Act in complaint case no. 19C of 1993 pending in the court of the Special Subordinate Judge, Economic Offences Court, Civil Courts, Patna.
5. 14.05.2010.
None appears for the petitioner.
However, Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha counsel for the Income Tax is in appearance. Since the order taking cognizance is dated 27.01.1993 and the court is not aware about the present stage of the trial, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed.
U.K.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue