Of Income Tax (Central) Bengaluru v. Muktar Shamshuddin Shaikh
High Court
03 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Of Income Tax (Central) Bengaluru v. Muktar Shamshuddin Shaikh
Date of order
03 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Of Income Tax (Central) Bengaluru v. Muktar Shamshuddin Shaikh, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Santosh
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
IN
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.976/2018
IN
STAMP NUMBER (MAIN) NO.1694 OF 2018WITH
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.977/2018
IN
STAMP NUMBER (MAIN) NO.1691 OF 2018WITH WITH
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.978/2018
IN
STAMP NUMBER (MAIN) NO.1687 OF 2018
WITH
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.979/2018
IN
STAMP NUMBER (MAIN) NO.1683 OF 2018
WITH
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.980/2018
IN
STAMP NUMBER (MAIN) NO.1685 OF 2018
The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax (Central) Bengaluru.
Versus
Muktar Shamshuddin Shaikh.
….. Applicant.
…... Respondent.
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Applicant.
Ms. A. Fernandes, Advocate for Respondents.
Coram : R.D. Dhanuka &
Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 3 April 2019.
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The
2 mcas976-18ors.dt.03-04-19
learned Counsel for the Respondents has no objection if the delay asprayed for is condoned. The statement is accepted.
2.
The delay in filing the Appeals is condoned as prayed.
3. Misc. Civil Applications are disposed of on the aforesaidterms. No order as to costs.
. Prithviraj K. Chavan, J
R.D. Dhanuka, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue