Of Income Tax(Central)-1 v. M/S Royal Fragrances Private Limited
High Court
11 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Of Income Tax(Central)-1 v. M/S Royal Fragrances Private Limited
Date of order
11 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Of Income Tax(Central)-1 v. M/S Royal Fragrances Private Limited, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~6.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
ITA 105/2017
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-1
..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.
Versus
M/S ROYAL FRAGRANCES PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Respondent Advocate with
Through: Mr.Gautam Jain, Mr.Piyush Kumar Kamal, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R
%
11.07.2017
1. The learned counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the issues urged by the Revenue in the present appeal stand covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court dated in Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III v. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR 45 (Del.).
2. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
JULY 11, 2017 ‘anb’
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue