In Of Maxop Investment Ltd v. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Issue: JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR) 1.This appeal came to be admitted on 02.11.2009 to consider following substantial question of law : “Whether in the facts and circumstances of the caseand on a proper interpretation of relevant provision ofIncome Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax AppellateTribunal was right in law...
Decision: Present Tax Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2035 of 2009
==========================================================
CORE HEALTH CARE LIMITED VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the Appellant(s) No. 1M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Opponent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMARand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 14/09/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR)
1.This appeal came to be admitted on 02.11.2009 to
consider following substantial question of law :
“Whether in the facts and circumstances of the caseand on a proper interpretation of relevant provision ofIncome Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax AppellateTribunal was right in law in sending back the matter tothe file of Assessing Officer and direct him to decidethis issue in view of the Rule 8D of the I.T. Rules, 1962and the decision of Mumbai Special Bench in the caseof Daga Capital Investment Pvt. Ltd.?”
2.The issue relating to merits of the case is said to
have been laid to rest by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case
of MAXOP Investment Ltd. versus Commissioner of
Income Tax reported in (2018) 402 ITR 640(SC).
3.Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merits,we direct the jurisdictional Assessing Officer to examine theclaim in light of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
4.
Present Tax Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
(ARAVIND KUMAR,CJ)
AMAR SINGH
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.