Om Parkash And Others v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandharand Another
High Court
17 Sep 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Om Parkash And Others v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandharand Another
Date of order
17 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Om Parkash And Others v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandharand Another, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the statement made by counsel for the respondents,on the basis of letter dated 17.09.2013, the present petition has beenrendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.4146 of 1995 Date of Order: 17.09.2013
Om Parkash and others
...Petitioners
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandharand another.
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Present:Ms. Supriya Garg, Advocatefor the petitioners.Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate,for the respondents.
RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral)
Counsel for the respondents states, on the basis of a letterdated 17.09.2013, received from the Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax, Range-II, Jalandhar, that the matter, in dispute, has already beendecided by the Settlement Commission in the year 2003.
Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to deny theaforementioned facts or assert any other fact to the contrary.
In view of the statement made by counsel for the respondents,on the basis of letter dated 17.09.2013, the present petition has beenrendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
(RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE
September 17, 2013 (DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON)nt JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue