Case Law › High Court › Om Prakash Arora v. Assistant Commission...

Om Prakash Arora v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 52(1) Delhi & Ors

High Court 18 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

18 Sep 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Om Prakash Arora v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 52(1) Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 153 of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 153 case law →

$~23 to 28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4072/2024 & CM APPL. 16637/2024 (stay) OM PRAKASH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Tarun Chanana, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 52(1) DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate. 24. + W.P.(C) 4073/2024 & CM APPL. 16641/2024 (stay) OM PRAKASH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Tarun Chanana, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 52(1), DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate. 25.+ W.P.(C) 4106/2024 & CM APPL. 16725/2024 (stay) OM PRAKASH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Tarun Chanana, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 52(1) DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate. 26. + W.P.(C) 4170/2024 & CM APPL. 16995/2024 (stay) OM PRAKASH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Tarun Chanana, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 52(1), DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate. 27. + W.P.(C) 4182/2024 & CM APPL. 17113/2024 (stay) OM PRAKASH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Tarun Chanana, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 52(1), DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate. 28.+ W.P.(C) 4183/2024 & CM APPL. 17115/2024 (stay) OM PRAKASH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor and Mr. Tarun Chanana, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 52(1) DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R18.09.2024 % We are informed that pursuant to the completion of the Section 153 assessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961, no additions were ultimately made. Consequently, these writ petitions are rendered infructuous. These petitions shall accordingly stand disposed of as having rendered infructuous. YASHWANT VARMA, J. RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. SEPTEMBER 18, 2024/vp

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.