Omp/130/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla v. M/S Associated Biotech
High Court
01 May 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Omp/130/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla v. M/S Associated Biotech
Date of order
01 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Omp/130/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla v. M/S Associated Biotech, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1.5.2019
OMP No. 130 of 2019 in ITA No. 97 of 2018 ITA No. 97 of 2018
Present: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/respondent. applicant/respondent.
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala and Mr. Devi Singh Verma, Advocates, for the non-applicant/appellant. Vandana Kuthiala and Mr. Devi Singh Verma, Advocates, for the non-applicant/appellant.
As prayed for, the application is allowed. The
presence of learned counsel for the respondent/applicant could not be marked in judgment dated 11.4.2019, as he could not appear in the case because his name was not reflected in the cause-list. Registry is directed to make necessary correction in judgment dated 11.4.2019 and issue a fresh certified copy. Application stands disposed of.
(Surya Kant) Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
May 1, 2019 (vikrant /rana)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue