Case Law › High Court › Ompm/41/2018 Of Ajay Goel v. Commissione...

Ompm/41/2018 Of Ajay Goel v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 19 Jun 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cmis

Parties

Date of order

19 Jun 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ompm/41/2018 Of Ajay Goel v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA No. of 2019. 19.06.2019Present:Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Negi, Advocate for the respondent. OMP (M) No. 41 of 2018. Heard. Having gone through thecontents and the reasons stated in this application,we are satisfied that the delay of 32 days asoccurred in filing the main appeal is neitherintentional nor deliberate and rather standssatisfactorily explained. Beping so, this applicationis allowed and the delay as occurred in filing themain appeal is condoned. The application standsdisposed of. ITA No. Be registered. List on 11[th] July, 2019.Record be produced on the date fixed. (Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Acting Chief Justice. (Jyotsna Rewal Dua),Judge June 19, 2019 (ps)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.