Case Law › High Court › Ompm/82/2019 Of Rajesh Popli v. Principa...

Ompm/82/2019 Of Rajesh Popli v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 Oct 2020 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cmis

Parties

Date of order

28 Oct 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ompm/82/2019 Of Rajesh Popli v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

OMP(M) No. 82 of 2019 28.10.2020 Present : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Ms. VandanaKuthiala, Advocate, for the respondent. (Through Video Conferencing) Despite opportunity reply not filed. For thereasons stated in the application, which is duly supportedby the affidavit of the appellant-applicant, we deem itproper to condone the delay of 2 months and 13 daysthat has been crept up in filing of the appeal. Orderedaccordingly. Application stands disposed of. ITA No. ______ of 2020 Be registered. Notice. Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate,appears and waives service of notice on behalf of therespondent. Tag alongwith ITA No. 1 of 2015. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 28[th] October, 2020 (sanjeev) (Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.