Case LawHigh Court › Omprakash Bagadia v. The Dy.commissioner...

Omprakash Bagadia v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Omprakash Bagadia v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Omprakash Bagadia v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2635 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2635 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2635 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1507 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1507 OF 2007 Omprakash Bagadia .. Appellant Vs. The Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent Mr.Sameer Dalal for the Appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd April, 2008 DATE : 2nd April, 2008 DATE : 2nd April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 615 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, specially in view of the fact that the Appellant was pursuing certain alternative remedy as stated in the said affidavit, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5.2.2007 whereby the assessee’s Misc.Application No.479/2005 was partly allowed and partly rejected, and the substantial question of law raised in the present Appeal relates to the aforesaid partly rejected Misc.Application. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on 21.4.2008. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan