Omprakash Bagadia v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Omprakash Bagadia v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Omprakash Bagadia v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2635 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2635 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2635 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1507 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1507 OF 2007
Omprakash Bagadia .. Appellant
Vs.
The Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent
Mr.Sameer Dalal for the Appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 615 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, specially
in view of the fact that the Appellant was pursuing
certain alternative remedy as stated in the said
affidavit, sufficient cause is made out for condonation
of delay. Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal dated 5.2.2007 whereby the assessee’s
Misc.Application No.479/2005 was partly allowed and
partly rejected, and the substantial question of law
raised in the present Appeal relates to the aforesaid
partly rejected Misc.Application. There is no case of
inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of
the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on
21.4.2008.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.