One Question Is Urged By The Department Is Whether Itat Is Right In Holding That Unless There Is A Cessation Of Liability, Income Cannot Be Added Under Section v. Sugauli Sagar Works (P) Ltd 236 Itr 513 (Sc) And Of The Gujarat High Court In Cit V

Order No. 4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.125 of 2012 ….The Commissioner of Income Tax, AppellantCuttack Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Sr. S.C, Income Tax -versus- ….Respondent M/s. Utkal Highway, Cuttack CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER 21.02.2022 1. The Department is directed against the impugned order dated 25[th] June, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench Cuttack in the ITA No.23/CTK/2012 for the Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. One question is urged by the Department is whether ITAT is right in holding that unless there is a cessation of liability, income cannot be added under Section 41(1) of the Act. 3. The contention of the Department was that since the assessee received the payment indirectly through credit into its account it would amount to reduction of its liability. However, the ITAT has rejected the above contention by holding that in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Sugauli Sagar Works (P) Ltd 236 ITR 513 (SC) and of the Gujarat High Court in CIT v. T.TUDU Silver Cotton Mills Co. Ltd., 254 ITR 728 (Guj) unless there is a cessation of liability, income cannot be added under Section 41(1) of the Act. Actually, even on 31[st] March, 2007, the liability owing to M/s. Balaji Associates is shown Rs. 1661281/-. Consequently, liability had not ceased. 4. Since the entire decision is based on facts, this Court is not inclined to entertain the appeal. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge