Op/10100/2002 Of Autumn Wood Resorts v. The Agrl.income Tax& Sales Tax
High Court
18 Sep 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Op/10100/2002 Of Autumn Wood Resorts v. The Agrl.income Tax& Sales Tax
Date of order
18 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Op/10100/2002 Of Autumn Wood Resorts v. The Agrl.income Tax& Sales Tax, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 27TH BHADRA 1929
OP.No. 10100 of 2002(B)
-----------------------
PETITIONER:
------------
AUTUMN WOOD RESORTS,CHINNAKANAL P.O.,
NADUPARA,MUNNAR,REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER
PRAVEEN XAVIER.
BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MUHAMED KUTTY
RESPONDENTS:
-------------
THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND SALES
TAX OFFICER,DEVIKULAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER ON CMP 17920 OF 2002 IN OP 10100 OF 2002
DISMISSED
18.9.2007
SD/-C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION IN FORM NO. A DATED 12.12.2001 SUBMITTED BY THEPETITIONER.
EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF SNOTICE NO. A1-2802/2001 DATED 15.1.2002 ISSUED BY THERESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 26.1.2002 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION IN FORM B NO. 22235517 DATED27.3.2002 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 27.3.2002 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF CHALAN DATED 27.3.2002 REMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL.
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
--------------------------------------------
O.P. NO. 10100 OF 2002
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 18th day of September, 2007
JUDGMENT
The claim for C Form by the hotel was allowed by the Officeronly for purchase of some of the items. Obviously the hotel is notentitled to C Form for the purchase of other equipments as it is notengaged in manufacture of any goods. O.P. is therefore dismissed.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.