Case LawHigh Court › Op/28687/2000 Of M/S.vedicattu Engineeri...

Op/28687/2000 Of M/S.vedicattu Engineering v. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2

High Court 21 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Op/28687/2000 Of M/S.vedicattu Engineering v. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2
Date of order
21 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Op/28687/2000 Of M/S.vedicattu Engineering v. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2008 / 1ST MAGHA 1929 OP.No. 28687 of 2000(M) ----------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M/S. VEDICATTU ENGINEERING COMPANY, MUTTAR, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER V.T. JOSEPH. BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR SRI.DALE P.KURIEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), WARD I, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SC FOR IT SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CMP NOS. 48410 OF 2000 AND 59757 OF 2000 IN OP 28687 OF 2000 DISMISSED 21.1.2008 SD/-C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.SD/-T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE. C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. -------------------------------------------- O. P. No. 28687 OF 2000 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J. Since petitioner has filed income tax appeal against the order ofthe Tribunal, confirming Commissioner's order under Section 263 ofthe I.T. Act, this O.P. filed challenging the revised assessment pursuantto order under Section 263 of the Act has become infructuous and isclosed accordingly. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan