Op/28687/2000 Of M/S.vedicattu Engineering v. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2
High Court
21 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Op/28687/2000 Of M/S.vedicattu Engineering v. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2
Date of order
21 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Op/28687/2000 Of M/S.vedicattu Engineering v. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2008 / 1ST MAGHA 1929
OP.No. 28687 of 2000(M)
-----------------------
PETITIONER:
------------
M/S. VEDICATTU ENGINEERING COMPANY, MUTTAR, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED
BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER V.T. JOSEPH.
BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR
SRI.DALE P.KURIEN
RESPONDENTS:
-------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, ALAPPUZHA.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), WARD I, ALAPPUZHA.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SC FOR IT
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 21/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER ON CMP NOS. 48410 OF 2000 AND 59757 OF 2000 IN OP 28687 OF 2000
DISMISSED
21.1.2008
SD/-C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.SD/-T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE.
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
O. P. No. 28687 OF 2000
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of January, 2008
JUDGMENT
C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J.
Since petitioner has filed income tax appeal against the order ofthe Tribunal, confirming Commissioner's order under Section 263 ofthe I.T. Act, this O.P. filed challenging the revised assessment pursuantto order under Section 263 of the Act has become infructuous and isclosed accordingly.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.