Case LawHigh Court › Op/6731/2003 Of S.girija v. Agrl.income...

Op/6731/2003 Of S.girija v. Agrl.income Tax And Sales Tax Officer

High Court 07 Feb 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Op/6731/2003 Of S.girija v. Agrl.income Tax And Sales Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Op/6731/2003 Of S.girija v. Agrl.income Tax And Sales Tax Officer, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 18TH MAGHA 1928 OP.No. 6731 of 2003(B) ---------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. S.GIRIJA W/O. SUBBARAM, CARDAMOM PLANTER PANAI PURAM P.O.. 2. S.ANANDAN S/O. V.SUBBRAM, CARDAMOM PLANTER, PANAI PURAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.SANTHARAM.P RESPONDENTS: ------------- AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND SALES TAX OFFICER, OFFICER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND SALES TAX OFFICER, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.11781/2003 IN O.P.NO.6731/2003 DISMISSED. 7-2-2007SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10-9-2002 EXT.P2. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 10-9-2002 EXT.P3. TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORERESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONERS ON 4-1-2003 / TRUE COPY / KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- O.P.No.6731 Of 2003 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 7[th]day of February, 2007 JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- 1.To call for the records leading to Ext.P1 and P2 notice and toissue a writ of certiorari quashing the same. 2.Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamusdirecting the respondent to recover the amount due from Ext.P1 andP2 notice, from the earlier assessee, Smt.G.Sumathi and to keep inabeyance all further proceedings against the petitioner. 3.Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamusdirecting the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders inExt.P3 petition within a time limit and to keep in abeyance allfurther proceedings against the petitioners, in Ext.P1 and P2notices. There will be a direction to the respondents to look into Ext.P3 and passappropriate orders with notice to the petitioners, if not already done, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. The interim order in C.M.P.No.11781/2003 will continue till such time. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) KURIAN JOSEPH, J. O.P.NO.6731/2003 JUDGMENT 7[th] February, 2007
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan