O.p.goel (Huf) Through O.p.goel (Karta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal
High Court
08 Jan 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
O.p.goel (Huf) Through O.p.goel (Karta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal
Date of order
08 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In O.p.goel (Huf) Through O.p.goel (Karta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the above, the instant appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty as aforementioned.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH.
ITA No.795 of 2008
Date of decision: 8.1.2009
O.P.Goel (HUF) through O.P.Goel (Karta).
vs.
..Appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnal
..Respondent.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR.HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH.
---
Present:Mr.Pankaj Jain, Advocate, for the appellant.
--
J.S.KHEHAR,J. (Oral)
Through the instant appeal the appellant has impugned theorder passed by the Revenue culminating in the order dated 6.5.2008,passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench-C, New Delhi,wherein, the appeal preferred by the appellant-assessee was dismissed inlimine on the presumption that the assessee was not interested to pursue thesame.
The impugned order dated 6.5.2008 also reveals, that libertywas granted to the assessee to move an application under rule 24 of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, for the re-call of the appellateorder dated 6.5.2008 (Annexure A-3). It is acknowledged by the learnedcounsel for the appellant, that the appellant-assessee has already moved anapplication under the aforesaid rule 24, for re-call of the impugned orderdated 6.5.2008 (Annexure A-3) and that the same is pending considerationbefore the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench-C, New Delhi.
In view of the factual position, noticed in the foregoing
ITA No.795 of 2008
paragraph, learned counsel for the appellant unilaterally states, that theappellant may be permitted to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty topursue in the first instance the application filed by the appellant-assesseeunder rule 24 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, pendingbefore the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench-C, New Delhi.
In view of the above, the instant appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty as aforementioned.
( J.S.Khehar) Judge
January 8, 2009rk
(Nawab Singh ) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.