Oppo Mobiles India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-30 & Anr
High Court
16 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Oppo Mobiles India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-30 & Anr
Date of order
16 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Oppo Mobiles India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-30 & Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4947/2024
OPPO MOBILES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Mr. Nikhil Agarwal & Mr. Puru Medhira, Advs.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-30 & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC with Ms. Nupur Sharma & Mr. Parth Semwal, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
16.04.2024
%
Mr. Maratha, learned counsel representing the respondents, on instructions states that the grievance of the writ petitioner shall be duly resolved within a period of three weeks from today. The statement so made is recorded and accepted.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
APRIL 16, 2024/kk
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue