In Oracle Financial Servicessoftware Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-13(1)(1) & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.952 OF 2019
Oracle Financial ServicesSoftware Ltd.
.... Petitioner
versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-13(1)(1) & Ors.... Respondents
…....
•Mr.Sukhsagar Sayal i/b. Mr.Sameer Dalal, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 05[th] APRIL, 2019.
P.C. :
1. Counsel for the Petitioner sought permission to
withdraw the Petition. Permission granted.
2. Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.