Order v. Kiadb In Ita

1 IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF JULY, 2010. PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.SRBBNIVASKH GOWDA ITA NO.109/2016 BETWERE COMMISSIONBR OF INCOMETAX, HUBLI. APPRLLANT (By SRI. E. I. SANMATHI, ADV.) AND: M/S. NORTH WEST KARNATAKA|ROAD CORPORATION,GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI.PAN NO.AAATNSO430.| ... RESPONDENT (NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O RESPONDENT) 2 THIS [TA IS UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 08/05/2015)PASSED IN ITA NO.846/BANG/2011 PRAYING TO DECIDE|THE FOREGOING QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE)RFORMULATBD BY THR HON’BLE COURT AS DBEMBD FITANI)SETASIDETHE.APPBRLLATEORDERDATHD.08.05.2015|PASSEDBY|THERITAT,“A?BENCH,BENGALURU,IN-APPEALPROCEHKEDINGNO.|ITA|NO.846/BANG/2011 & TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF|AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,JAYANT PATEL J.,PASSEDTHE FOLLOWING: ORDER sri. E.I. Sanmathi, learned counsel for theappellant-Revenue states that the matter is covered bythe decision of this Court in the case of DIT(E) vs.KIADB in ITA No.261/2013 dated 07.11.2014. oD Under the circumstances, we do not findthat any substantial questions of law would arise. � �7297��457�>/7<724�1>>716�0<�80<30<<78��� ���$)� ����������� �����������