Case Law › High Court › Order v. Paradeep Port Trust

Order v. Paradeep Port Trust

High Court 31 Jan 2023 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

31 Jan 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Order v. Paradeep Port Trust, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Consequently, following the said order dated 5[th] January, 2023 of this Court, the present appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Order No. 03. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.13 of 2021 …. Appellant Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Bhubaneswar Mr. Radheyshyam Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel along with Mr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel-versus- ….Respondent Paradip Port Trust CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN ORDER 31.01.2023 1. The two questions sought to be urged by the Revenue-Appellant in the present appeal against the order dated 8[th] October, 2020 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in ITA No.211/CTK/2018 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 already stand answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the order of this Court dated 5[th] January, 2023 passed in ITA No.90 of 2017 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Cuttack v. Paradeep Port Trust). 2. Consequently, following the said order dated 5[th] January, 2023 of this Court, the present appeal is also dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.