Order v. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot
High Court
25 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Order v. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot
Date of order
25 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Order v. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
BBREFOR
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT|
;WRIT PETITION NO. 4140 OF 2020 (TIT)
BRTWEEN:
SHRI MAHBSHWARA CREDITCO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LID.,M.G.ROAD, HAVERI TALUK AND DISTRICT-571110..REP BY ITS SECRETARY-.MR.CHANDRASHEBHKHARIAH MATAD
... PETITIONE
(BY SRI. MAHESH R UPPIN, ADVOCATE)
AN)
1,COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SHREE TOWERS,HADADI MAIN ROAD,OPP D.R.R.HOSPITAL,DAVANAGERE-57 7/002SHREE TOWERS,HADADI MAIN ROAD,OPP D.R.R.HOSPITAL,DAVANAGERE-57 7/002
2 INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD NO.95, SHREE TOWERS,HADADI MAIN ROAD,OPP D.R.R.HOSPITAL,DAVANAGERE-5/ /002.HADADI MAIN ROAD,OPP D.R.R.HOSPITAL,DAVANAGERE-5/ /002.
3)INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD NO.1, |HAVERI TALUK AND DISTRICT-581110.WARD NO.1, |HAVERI TALUK AND DISTRICT-581110.
— RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226)AND 227 OF JHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO)QUASHTHRE ASSESSMENTORDER DATEBED 17.12.201PASSED BY THER R-2 MARKED AS ANNBEXURE-A OR IN THALTERNATIVE AND ETC.,,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR,ORDERS|THIS DAY,THE COURT MADE THR FOLLOWING:-.
ORDER
Petitioner, a society being an Assessee, is invoking|the writ jurisdiction of this court for assailing theassessment order dated 17.12.2019 passed by the 2[0>]respondent herein at Annexure-A, whereby the benefitotherwise available to it 1n terms of Section SOP ot theIncome Tax Act, 1961, has been denied.
|On request, the learned Senior Panel Counsel|ori.Jeevan J Neeralgi accepts notice for respondents andmakes submission in justification of the impugned order;he also submits that since the petitioner admittedly hasfiled statutory appeal, he cannot pursue plural remedies.
3.|Having heard the learned counsel for the.parties and having perused the Petition Papers, this courtis Of a considered opinion that the question as toavailability of the benefit under section 80P of the Act infavour of societies of the kind having been answered infavour of the Assessee by a Division Bench of this Courtvide judgment dated 09.02.2014 in Income Tax AppealNo.5006/2013 between the Commissioner of Income TaxVs. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara SanghaNiyamitha, Bagalkot.
In the above circumstances, the petitioner’s subject|appeal needs to be considered by the l[3-]respondentexpeditiously and without insisting upon statutory pre-deposit.
Writ Petition is disposed off, ordering accordingly.
Time for compliance is three months.
No costs.
BsvV
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.