Order v. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot
High Court
25 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Order v. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot
Date of order
25 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Order v. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
BBREFOR
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT|;WRIT PETITION NO. 4324 OF 2020 (TIT)
BRTWEEN:
THE SASTHANA SERVICE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,(WRONGLY SHOWN AS“THRK SASTHANA SBRVICE;CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD..,)N.H.66, SASTHANA POST,UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 5/76 226.REP BY ITS CHIEF EXBKECUTIVE OFFICERMR VIJAYA POOQJUARY
... PETITIONE
(BY SRI. MAHESH R UPPIN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS )-AAYAKAR BHAVAN|C.R.BUILDING, N.G.ROAD,ATTAVARA,MANGALURU - 575 OO1
2 INCOME TAX OFFICER,|WARD — 2,|AAYAKAR BHAVAN,AADI UDUPI MALPE ROAD,UDUPI - 5/76 103.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226)AND 227 OF JHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO)QUASHTHRE ASSESSMENTORDER DATEBKED 22.11.20PASSED IN ORDER PASSED BY THRE R-2 MARKED ASANNE XURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR,ORDERS|THIS DAY,THE COURT MADE THR FOLLOWING:-.
ORDER
Petitioner, a society being an Assessee, is invoking|the writ jurisdiction of this court for assailing theassessment order dated 22.11.2019 passed by the 2[1?]respondent herein at Annexure-A, whereby the benefitotherwise available to it 1n terms of Section SOP ot theIncome Tax Act, 1961, has been denied.
|On request, the learned Senior Panel Counsel|ori.Jeevan J Neeralgi accepts notice for respondents andmakes submission in justification of the impugned order;he also submits that since the petitioner admittedly hasfiled statutory appeal, he cannot pursue plural remedies.
3.|Having heard the learned counsel for the.parties and having perused the Petition Papers, this courtis Of a considered opinion that the question as toavailability of the benefit under section 80P of the Act infavour of societies of the kind having been answered infavour of the Assessee by a Division Bench of this Courtvide judgment dated 09.02.2014 in Income Tax AppealNo.5006/2013 between the Commissioner of Income TaxVs. Sri. Bilur Gurubasava Pattna Sahakara SanghaNiyamitha, Bagalkot.
In the above circumstances, the petitioner’s subject|appeal needs to be considered by the l[4.]respondentexpeditiously and without insisting upon statutory pre-deposit.
Writ Petition is disposed off, ordering accordingly.
Time for compliance is three months.
No costs.
Bsv/
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.