Case LawHigh Court › Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdicgtion In...

Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdicgtion Income Tax Reference v. M/S. London Star Diamond Pvt. Ltd

High Court 10 Aug 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdicgtion Income Tax Reference v. M/S. London Star Diamond Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
10 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdicgtion Income Tax Reference v. M/S. London Star Diamond Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Issue: 1337& 1338/Bom/1986, forAssessment Years 1981-82 and 1982-83, under section 256(1) ofthe Income-tax Act the Tribunal has referred the following question oflaw for the opinion of this court at the instance of the Revenue: (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Tribunal was...

Decision: Reference is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 417 of 1995 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Applicant. vs. M/s. London Star Diamond Pvt. Ltd...... Respondent Mr. Parag Vyas i/b. H. D. Rathod for Applicant. Mr. B. V. Jhaveri for Respondent P. C. : CORAM: V. C. DAGAAND A. S. AGUIAR JJ.Date: 10[th] August, 2005. 1. By this reference arising out of I.T.A. No. 1337& 1338/Bom/1986, forAssessment Years 1981-82 and 1982-83, under section 256(1) ofthe Income-tax Act the Tribunal has referred the following question oflaw for the opinion of this court at the instance of the Revenue: (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding theorder of the C.I.T. (A) holding that the assessee was anindustrial company and not a trading company and thusdirecting to tax income of the assessee companytreating the same as industrial company. 2. Both counsel appearing for the rival parties agree that the questionreferred to above, stands covered by the judgment of this court inthe case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. London StarDiamond Co. (I) Ltd., reported in [1995] 213 ITR 517. In thisview of the mater the question is answered in the affirmative i.e., infavour of the assessee, against the revenue. Reference is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. (V. C. DAGA J. ) (A. S. AGUIAR J.) -x-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan