In Oriental Aromatics Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.574 OF 2011
Oriental Aromatics Limited
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Jitendra Singh for the appellant.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 15[th] December 2011
1.Counsel for the parties state that the questions of law raised in this appeal are covered against the appellant – assessee by the decision of this
Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Bharat R. Ruia (HUF) reported in 337 ITR 452 (Bom ).
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue